text:
(a) The following projects are eligible for grants from the fund for the purposes and amounts specified:

(1) BART to San Jose; extend BART from Fremont to Downtown San Jose in Santa Clara and Alameda Counties. Seven hundred twenty-five million dollars ($725,000,000). The lead applicant is the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.

(2) Fremont-South Bay Commuter Rail; acquire rail line and start commuter rail service between Fremont and San Jose in Santa Clara and Alameda Counties. Thirty-five million dollars ($35,000,000). The lead applicant is the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.

(3) Route 101; widen freeway from four to eight lanes south of San Jose, Bernal Road to Burnett Avenue in Santa Clara County. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.

(4) Route 680; add northbound HOV lane over Sunol Grade, Milpitas to Route 84 in Santa Clara and Alameda Counties. Sixty million dollars ($60,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Alameda County Transportation Commission.

(5) Route 101; add northbound lane to freeway through San Jose, Route 87 to Trimble Road in Santa Clara County. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.

(6) Route 262; major investment study for cross connector freeway, Route 680 to Route 880 near Warm Springs in Santa Clara County. One million dollars ($1,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.

(7) Caltrain; expand service to Gilroy; improve parking, stations, and platforms along UPRR line in Santa Clara County. Fifty-five million dollars ($55,000,000). The lead applicant is the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.

(8) Route 880; reconstruct Coleman Avenue Interchange near San Jose Airport in Santa Clara County. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.

(9) Capitol Corridor; improve intercity rail line between Oakland and San Jose, and at Jack London Square and Emeryville stations in Alameda and Santa Clara Counties. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority.

(10) Regional Express Bus; acquire low-emission buses for new express service on HOV lanes regionwide. In nine counties. Forty million dollars ($40,000,000). The lead applicant is the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

(11) San Francisco Bay Southern Crossing; complete feasibility and financial studies for new San Francisco Bay crossing (new bridge, HOV/transit bridge, terminal connection, or second BART tube) in Alameda and San Francisco or San Mateo Counties. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

(12) Bay Area Transit Connectivity; complete studies of, and fund related improvements for, the I-580 Livermore Corridor; the Hercules Rail Station and related improvements, West Contra Costa County and Route 4 Corridors in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. Seventeen million dollars ($17,000,000). Of the amount specified, seven million dollars ($7,000,000) shall be made available for the Route 4 Corridor study and improvements, seven million dollars ($7,000,000) shall be made available for the I-580 Corridor study and improvements, and three million dollars ($3,000,000) shall be made available for the Hercules Rail Station study and improvements. The lead applicant for the Hercules Rail Station and related improvements in west Contra Costa County is the Contra Costa County Transportation Authority. The lead applicants, for the I-580 Livermore Study and improvements are the Alameda County Transportation Commission and the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District. The lead applicants for the Route 4 Corridor study and improvements are the Contra Costa County Transportation Authority and the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District.

(13) Caltrain Peninsula Corridor; acquire rolling stock, add passing tracks, and construct pedestrian access structure at stations between San Francisco and San Jose in San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara Counties. One hundred twenty-seven million dollars ($127,000,000). The lead applicant is the Peninsula Joint Powers Board.

(14) Caltrain; extension to Salinas in Monterey County. Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000). The lead applicant is the Transportation Agency for Monterey County.

(15) Route 24; Caldecott Tunnel; add fourth bore tunnel with additional lanes in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

(16) Route 4; construct one or more phases of improvements to widen freeway to eight lanes from Railroad through Loveridge Road, including two HOV lanes, and to six or more lanes from east of Loveridge Road through Hillcrest. Thirty-nine million dollars ($39,000,000). The lead applicant is the Contra Costa Transportation Authority.

(17) Route 101; add reversible HOV lane through San Rafael, Sir Francis Drake Boulevard to North San Pedro Road in Marin County. Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Marin Congestion Management Agency.

(18) Route 101; widen eight miles of freeway to six lanes, Novato to Petaluma (Novato Narrows) in Marin and Sonoma Counties. Twenty-one million dollars ($21,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Sonoma County Transportation Authority.

(19) Bay Area Water Transit Authority; establish a regional water transit system beginning with Treasure Island in the City and County of San Francisco. Two million dollars ($2,000,000). The lead applicant is the Bay Area Water Transit Authority.

(20) San Francisco Muni Third Street Light Rail; extend Third Street line to Chinatown (tunnel) in the City and County of San Francisco. One hundred forty million dollars ($140,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency.

(21) San Francisco Muni Ocean Avenue Light Rail; reconstruct Ocean Avenue light rail line to Route 1 near California State University, San Francisco, in the City and County of San Francisco. Seven million dollars ($7,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency.

(22) Route 101; environmental study for reconstruction of Doyle Drive, from Lombard Street/Richardson Avenue to Route 1 Interchange in the City and County of San Francisco. Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Francisco County Transportation Authority.

(23) Caltrain Peninsula Corridor; complete grade separations at Poplar Avenue (San Mateo), 25th Avenue or vicinity (San Mateo), and Linden Avenue (South San Francisco) in San Mateo County. Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Mateo County Transportation Authority.

(24) Vallejo Baylink Ferry; acquire low-emission ferryboats to expand Baylink Vallejo-San Francisco service in Solano County. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the City of Vallejo.

(25) I-80/I-680/Route 12 Interchange in Fairfield in Solano County; 12 interchange complex in seven stages (Stage 1). Thirteen million dollars ($13,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Solano Transportation Authority.

(26) ACE Commuter Rail; add siding on UPRR line in Livermore Valley in Alameda County. One million dollars ($1,000,000). The lead applicant is the Alameda County Transportation Commission.

(27) Vasco Road Safety and Transit Enhancement Project in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. Eleven million dollars ($11,000,000). The lead applicant is Alameda County Transportation Commission.

(28) Parking Structure at Transit Village at Richmond BART Station in Contra Costa County. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the City of Richmond.

(29) AC Transit; buy two fuel cell buses and fueling facility for demonstration project in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. Eight million dollars ($8,000,000). The lead applicant is the Alameda Contra Costa Transit District.

(30) Implementation of commuter rail passenger service from Cloverdale south to San Rafael and Larkspur in Marin and Sonoma Counties. Thirty-seven million dollars ($37,000,000). The lead applicant is the Sonoma-Marin Area Transit Authority.

(31) Route 580; construct eastbound and westbound HOV lanes from Tassajara Road/Santa Rita Road to Vasco Road in Alameda County. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Alameda County Transportation Commission.

(32) North Coast Railroad; repair and upgrade track to meet Class II (freight) standards in Napa, Sonoma, Marin, Mendocino, and Humboldt Counties. Sixty million dollars ($60,000,000). The lead applicant is the North Coast Rail Authority. Except for the amounts specified in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) and subdivision (b) of Section 14456.50, no part of the specified amount may be made available to the authority until it has made a full accounting to the commission demonstrating that the expenditure of funds provided to the authority in the Budget Act of 2000 (Chapter 52 of the Statutes of 2000) was consistent with the limitations placed on those funds in that Budget Act.

(33) Bus Transit; acquire low-emission buses for Los Angeles County MTA bus transit service. One hundred fifty million dollars ($150,000,000). The lead applicant is the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(34) Blue Line to Los Angeles; new rail line Pasadena to Los Angeles in Los Angeles County. Forty million dollars ($40,000,000). The lead applicant is the Pasadena Metro Blue Line Construction Authority.

(35) Pacific Surfliner; triple track intercity rail line within Los Angeles County and add run-through tracks through Los Angeles Union Station in Los Angeles County. One hundred million dollars ($100,000,000). The lead applicant is the department.

(36) Los Angeles Eastside Transit Extension; build new light rail line in East Los Angeles, from Union Station to Atlantic via 1st Street to Lorena in Los Angeles County. Two hundred thirty-six million dollars ($236,000,000). The lead applicant is the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(37) Los Angeles Mid-City Transit Improvements; build Bus Rapid Transit system or Light Rail Transit in Mid-City/Westside/Exposition Corridors in Los Angeles County. Two hundred fifty-six million dollars ($256,000,000). The lead applicant is the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(38) Los Angeles-San Fernando Valley Transit Extension; (A) build an East-West Bus Rapid Transit system in the Burbank-Chandler corridor, from North Hollywood to Warner Center. One hundred forty-five million dollars ($145,000,000). (B) Build a North-South corridor bus transit project that interfaces with the foregoing East-West Burbank-Chandler Corridor project and with the Ventura Boulevard Rapid Bus project. One hundred million dollars ($100,000,000). The lead applicant for both extension projects is the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(39) Route 405; add northbound HOV lane over Sepulveda Pass, Route 10 to Route 101 in Los Angeles County. Ninety million dollars ($90,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(40) Route 10; add HOV lanes on San Bernardino Freeway over Kellogg Hill, near Pomona, Route 605 to Route 57 in Los Angeles County. Ninety million dollars ($90,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(41) Route 5; add HOV lanes on Golden State Freeway through San Fernando Valley, Route 170 (Hollywood Freeway) to Route 14 (Antelope Valley Freeway) in Los Angeles County. Fifty million dollars ($50,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(42) Route 5; widen Santa Ana Freeway to 10 lanes (two HOV + two mixed flow), Orange County line to Route 710, with related major arterial improvements, in Los Angeles County. One hundred twenty-five million dollars ($125,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(43) Route 5; improve Carmenita Road Interchange in Norwalk in Los Angeles County. Seventy-one million dollars ($71,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(44) Route 47 (Terminal Island Freeway); construct interchange at Ocean Boulevard Overpass in the City of Long Beach in Los Angeles County. Eighteen million four hundred thousand dollars ($18,400,000). The lead applicant is the Port of Long Beach.

(45) Route 710; complete Gateway Corridor study, Los Angeles/Long Beach ports to Route 5 in Los Angeles County. Two million dollars ($2,000,000). The lead applicant is the department.

(46) Route 1; reconstruct intersection at Route 107 in Torrance in Los Angeles County. Two million dollars ($2,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(47) Route 101; California Street off-ramp in Ventura County. Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the City of San Buenaventura.

(48) Route 101; corridor analysis and PSR to improve corridor from Route 170 (North Hollywood Freeway) to Route 23 in Thousand Oaks (Ventura County) in Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. Three million dollars ($3,000,000). The lead applicant is the department.

(49) Hollywood Intermodal Transportation Center; intermodal facility at Highland Avenue and Hawthorn Avenue in the City of Los Angeles. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the City of Los Angeles.

(50) Route 71; complete three miles of six-lane freeway through Pomona, from Route 10 to Route 60 in Los Angeles County. Thirty million dollars ($30,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(51) Route 101/405; add auxiliary lane and widen ramp through freeway interchange in Sherman Oaks in Los Angeles County. Twenty-one million dollars ($21,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(52) Route 405; add HOV and auxiliary lanes for one mile in West Los Angeles, from Waterford Avenue to Route 10 in Los Angeles County. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

(53) Automated Signal Corridors (ATSAC); improve 479 automated signals in Victory/Ventura Corridor, and add 76 new automated signals in Sepulveda Boulevard and Route 118 Corridors in Los Angeles County. Sixteen million dollars ($16,000,000). The lead applicant is the City of Los Angeles.

(54) Alameda Corridor East; build grade separations on Burlington Northern-Santa Fe and Union Pacific Railroad lines, downtown Los Angeles to Los Angeles County line in Los Angeles County. One hundred fifty million dollars ($150,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments.

(55) Alameda Corridor East; build grade separations on Burlington Northern-Santa Fe and Union Pacific Railroad lines, with rail-to-rail separation at Colton through San Bernardino County. Ninety-five million dollars ($95,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Bernardino Associated Governments.

(56) Metrolink; track and signal improvements on Metrolink; San Bernardino line in San Bernardino County. Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000). The lead applicant is the Southern California Regional Rail Authority.

(57) Route 215; add HOV lanes through downtown San Bernardino, Route 10 to Route 30 in San Bernardino County. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission.

(58) Route 10; widen freeway to eight lanes through Redlands, Route 30 to Ford Street in San Bernardino County. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission.

(59) Route 10; Live Oak Canyon Interchange, including, but not limited to, the 14th Street Bridge over Wilson Creek, in the City of Yucaipa in San Bernardino County. Eleven million dollars ($11,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission.

(60) Route 15; southbound truck climbing lane at two locations in San Bernardino County. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission.

(61) Route 10; reconstruct Apache Trail Interchange east of Banning in Riverside County. Thirty million dollars ($30,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Riverside County Transportation Commission.

(62) Route 91; add HOV lanes through downtown Riverside, Mary Street to Route 60/215 junction in Riverside County. Forty million dollars ($40,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Riverside County Transportation Commission.

(63) Route 60; add seven miles of HOV lanes west of Riverside, Route 15 to Valley Way in Riverside County. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Riverside County Transportation Commission.

(64) Route 91; improve the Green River Interchange and add auxiliary lane and connector ramp east of the Green River Interchange to northbound Route 71 in Riverside County. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Riverside County Transportation Commission.

(70) Route 22; add HOV lanes on Garden Grove Freeway, Route I-405 to Route 55 in Orange County. Two hundred six million five hundred thousand dollars ($206,500,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Orange County Transportation Authority.

(73) Alameda Corridor East; (Orangethorpe Corridor) build grade separations on Burlington Northern-Santa Fe line, Los Angeles County line through Santa Ana Canyon in Orange County. Twenty-eight million dollars ($28,000,000). The lead applicant is the Orange County Transportation Authority.

(74) Pacific Surfliner; double track intercity rail line within San Diego County, add maintenance yard in San Diego County. Forty-seven million dollars ($47,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or North County Transit District.

(75) San Diego Transit Buses; acquire about 85 low-emission buses for San Diego transit service in San Diego County. Thirty million dollars ($30,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board.

(76) Coaster Commuter Rail; acquire one new train set to expand commuter rail in San Diego County. Fourteen million dollars ($14,000,000). The lead applicant is North County Transit District.

(77) Route 94; complete environmental studies to add capacity to Route 94 corridor, downtown San Diego to Route 125 in Lemon Grove in San Diego County. Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or San Diego Association of Governments.

(78) East Village access; improve access to light rail from new in-town East Village development in San Diego County. Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board.

(79) North County Light Rail; build new 20-mile light rail line from Oceanside to Escondido in San Diego County. Eighty million dollars ($80,000,000). The lead applicant is North County Transit District.

(80) Mid-Coast Light Rail; extend Old Town light rail line six miles to Balboa Avenue in San Diego County. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board.

(81) San Diego Ferry; acquire low-emission high-speed ferryboat for new off-coast service between San Diego and Oceanside in San Diego County. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the Port of San Diego.

(82) Routes 5/805; reconstruct and widen freeway interchange, Genesee Avenue to Del Mar Heights Road in San Diego County. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Diego Association of Governments.

(83) Route 15; add high-tech managed lane on I-15 freeway north of San Diego (Stage 1) from Route 163 to Route 78 in San Diego County. Seventy million dollars ($70,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Diego Association of Governments.

(84) Route 52; build four miles of new six-lane freeway to Santee, Mission Gorge to Route 67 in San Diego County. Forty-five million dollars ($45,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Diego Association of Governments.

(85) Route 56; construct approximately five miles of new freeway alignment between I-5 and I-15 from Carmel Valley to Rancho Penasquitos in the City of San Diego in San Diego County. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Diego Association of Governments.

(86) Route 905; build new six-lane freeway on Otay Mesa, Route 805 to Mexico Port of Entry in San Diego County. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Diego Association of Governments.

(87) Routes 94/125; build two new freeway connector ramps at Route 94/125 in Lemon Grove in San Diego County. Sixty million dollars ($60,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Diego Association of Governments.

(88) Route 5; realign freeway at Virginia Avenue, approaching San Ysidro Port of Entry to Mexico in San Diego County. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Diego Association of Governments.

(89) Route 99; improve Shaw Avenue Interchange in northern Fresno in Fresno County. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Council of Fresno County Governments.

(90) Route 99; widen freeway to six lanes, Kingsburg to Selma in Fresno County. Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Council of Fresno County Governments.

(91) Route 180; build new expressway east of Clovis, Clovis Avenue to Temperance Avenue in Fresno County. Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Council of Fresno County Governments.

(92) San Joaquin Corridor; improve track and signals along San Joaquin intercity rail line near Hanford in Kings County. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the department.

(93) Route 180; complete environmental studies to extend Route 180 westward from Mendota to I-5 in Fresno County. Seven million dollars ($7,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Council of Fresno County Governments.

(94) Route 43; widen to four-lane expressway from Kings County line to Route 99 in Selma in Fresno County. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Council of Fresno County Governments.

(95) Route 41; add auxiliary lane/operational improvements and improve ramps at Friant Road Interchange in Fresno in Fresno County. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Council of Fresno County Governments.

(96) Friant Road; widen to four lanes from Copper Avenue to Road 206 in Fresno County. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the County of Fresno.

(97) Operational improvements on Shaw Avenue, Chestnut Avenue, Willow Avenue, and Barstow Avenue near California State University at Fresno in Fresno County. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the California State University at Fresno. Of the amount authorized under this paragraph, the sum of two million dollars ($2,000,000) shall be transferred to the California State University at Fresno for the purposes of funding preliminary plans, working drawings, or both of those, and related program management costs for the Fresno Events Center.

(98) Peach Avenue; widen to four-lane arterial and add pedestrian overcrossings for three schools in Fresno County. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the City of Fresno.

(99) San Joaquin Corridor; improve track and signals along San Joaquin intercity rail line in seven counties. Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000). The lead applicant is the department.

(100) San Joaquin Valley Emergency Clean Air Attainment Program; incentives for the reduction of emissions from heavy-duty diesel engines operating within the eight-county San Joaquin Valley region. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.

(101) Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District bus fleet; acquisition of low-emission buses. Three million dollars ($3,000,000). The lead applicant is the Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District.

(102) Route 101 access; State Street smart corridor Advanced Traffic Corridor System (ATSC) technology in Santa Barbara County. One million three hundred thousand dollars ($1,300,000). The lead applicant is the City of Santa Barbara.

(103) Route 99; improve interchange at Seventh Standard Road, north of Bakersfield in Kern County. Eight million dollars ($8,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or Kern Council of Governments.

(104) Route 99; build seven miles of new six-lane freeway south of Merced, Buchanan Hollow Road to Healey Road in Merced County. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Merced County Association of Governments.

(105) Route 99; build two miles of new six-lane freeway, Madera County line to Buchanan Hollow Road in Merced County. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Merced County Association of Governments.

(106) Campus Parkway; build new arterial in Merced County from Route 99 to Bellevue Road. Twenty-three million dollars ($23,000,000). The lead applicant is the County of Merced.

(107) Route 205; widen freeway to six lanes, Tracy to I-5 in San Joaquin County. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Joaquin Council of Governments.

(108) Route 5; add northbound lane to freeway through Mossdale “Y”, Route 205 to Route 120 in San Joaquin County. Seven million dollars ($7,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the San Joaquin Council of Governments.

(109) Route 132; build four miles of new four-lane expressway in Modesto from Dakota Avenue to Route 99 and improve Route 99 Interchange in Stanislaus County. Twelve million dollars ($12,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Stanislaus Council of Governments.

(110) Route 132; build 3.5 miles of new four-lane expressway from Route 33 to the San Joaquin county line in Stanislaus and San Joaquin Counties. Two million dollars ($2,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Stanislaus Council of Governments.

(111) Route 198; build 10 miles of new four-lane expressway from Route 99 to Hanford in Kings and Tulare Counties. Fourteen million dollars ($14,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Kings County Association of Governments.

(112) Jersey Avenue; widen from 17th Street to 18th Street in Kings County. One million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000). The lead applicant is Kings County.

(113) Route 46; widen to four lanes for 33 miles from Route 5 to San Luis Obispo County line in Kern County. Thirty million dollars ($30,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Kern Council of Governments.

(114) Route 65; add four passing lanes, intersection improvement, and conduct environmental studies for ultimate widening to four lanes from Route 99 in Bakersfield to Tulare County line in Kern County. Twelve million dollars ($12,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Kern Council of Governments.

(115) South Line Light Rail; extend South Line three miles towards Elk Grove, from Meadowview Road to Calvine Road in Sacramento County. Seventy million dollars ($70,000,000). The lead applicant is the Sacramento Regional Transit District.

(116) Route 80 Light Rail Corridor; double-track Route 80 light rail line for express service in Sacramento County. Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the Sacramento Regional Transit District.

(117) Folsom Light Rail; extend light rail tracks from 7th Street and K Street to the Amtrak Depot in downtown Sacramento, and extend Folsom light rail from Mather Field Station to downtown Folsom. Add a new vehicle storage and maintenance facility in the area between the Sunrise Boulevard and Hazel Avenue Stations in Sacramento County. Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000). The lead applicant is the Sacramento Regional Transit District.

(118) Sacramento Emergency Clean Air/Transportation Plan (SECAT); incentive for the reduction of emissions from heavy-duty diesel engines operating within the Sacramento region. Fifty million dollars ($50,000,000). The lead applicant is the Sacramento Area Council of Governments.

(119) Convert Sacramento Regional Transit bus fleet to low emission and provide Yolo bus service by the Yolo County Transportation District; acquire approximately 50 replacement low-emission buses for service in Sacramento and Yolo Counties. Nineteen million dollars ($19,000,000). The lead applicants are the Sacramento Regional Transit District, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments, and the Yolo County Transportation District.

(121) Metropolitan Bakersfield System Study; to reduce congestion in the City of Bakersfield. Three hundred fifty thousand dollars ($350,000). The lead applicant is the Kern Council of Governments.

(122) Route 65; widening project from 7th Standard Road to Route 190 in Porterville. Three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000). The lead applicant is the County of Tulare.

(123) Oceanside Transit Center; parking structure. One million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000). The lead applicant is the City of Oceanside.

(126) Route 50/Watt Avenue Interchange; widening of overcrossing and modifications to interchange. Seven million dollars ($7,000,000). The lead applicant is the County of Sacramento.

(127) Route 85/Route 87; interchange completion; addition of two direct connectors for southbound Route 85 to northbound Route 87 and southbound Route 87 to northbound Route 85. Three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000). The lead applicant is the City of San Jose.

(128) Airport Road; reconstruction and intersection improvement project. Three million dollars ($3,000,000). The lead applicant is the County of Shasta.

(129) Route 62; traffic and pedestrian safety and utility undergrounding project in right-of-way of Route 62. Three million two hundred thousand dollars ($3,200,000). The lead applicant is the Town of Yucca Valley.

(133) Feasibility studies for grade separation projects for Union Pacific Railroad at Elk Grove Boulevard and Bond Road. One hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). The lead applicant is the City of Elk Grove.

(134) Route 50/Sunrise Boulevard; interchange modifications. Three million dollars ($3,000,000). The lead applicant is the County of Sacramento.

(135) Route 99/Sheldon Road; interchange project; reconstruction and expansion. Three million dollars ($3,000,000). The lead applicant is the County of Sacramento.

(138) Cross Valley Rail; upgrade track from Visalia to Huron. Four million dollars ($4,000,000). The lead applicant is the Cross Valley Rail Corridor Joint Powers Authority.

(139) Balboa Park BART Station; Phase I expansion. Six million dollars ($6,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District.

(140) City of Goshen; overpass for Route 99. One million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000). The lead applicant is the department.

(141) Union City; pedestrian bridge over Union Pacific rail lines. Two million dollars ($2,000,000). The lead applicant is the City of Union City.

(142) West Hollywood; repair, maintenance, and mitigation of Santa Monica Boulevard. Two million dollars ($2,000,000). The lead applicant is the City of West Hollywood.

(144) Seismic retrofit of the national landmark Golden Gate Bridge. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead applicant is the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District.

(145) Construction of a new siding in Sun Valley between Sheldon Street and Sunland Boulevard. Six million five hundred thousand dollars ($6,500,000). The lead applicant is the Southern California Regional Rail Authority.

(146) Construction of Palm Drive Interchange. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the Coachella Valley Association of Governments.

(148) Route 98; widening of eight miles between Route 111 and Route 7 from two lanes to four lanes. Ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The lead applicant is the department.

(149) Purchase of low-emission buses for express service on Route 17. Three million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($3,750,000). The lead applicant is the Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District.

(150) Renovation or rehabilitation of Santa Cruz Metro Center. One million dollars ($1,000,000). The lead applicant is the Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District.

(151) Purchase of five alternative fuel buses for the Pasadena Area Rapid Transit System. One million one hundred thousand dollars ($1,100,000). The lead applicant is the Pasadena Area Rapid Transit System.

(152) Pasadena Blue Line transit-oriented mixed-use development. One million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000). The lead applicant is the City of South Pasadena.

(153) Pasadena Blue Line utility relocation. Five hundred fifty thousand dollars ($550,000). The lead applicant is the City of South Pasadena.

(154) Route 134/I-5 Interchange study. One hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). The lead applicant is the department.

(156) Seismic retrofit and core segment improvements for the Bay Area Rapid Transit system. Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000). The lead applicant is the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District.

(157) Route 12; Congestion relief improvements from Route 29 to I-80 through Jamison Canyon. Seven million dollars ($7,000,000). The lead applicant is the department.

(158) Remodel the intersection of Olympic Boulevard, Mateo Street, and Porter Street and install a new traffic signal. Two million dollars ($2,000,000). The lead applicant is the City of Los Angeles.

(159) Route 101; redesign and construction of Steele Lane Interchange. Six million dollars ($6,000,000). The lead applicant is the department or the Sonoma County Transportation Authority.

(b) As used in this section, “route” is a state highway route as identified in Article 3 (commencing with Section 300) of Chapter 2 of Division 1 of the Streets and Highways Code.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 2010, Ch. 491, Sec. 2. (SB 1318) Effective January 1, 2011.)

article: 5. Eligible Projects

path: 2. GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA > 3. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT > 4.5. The Traffic Congestion Relief Act of 2000 > 5. Eligible Projects


kind: section

code: GOV

text: As of June 30, 2017, projects in Section 14556.40 for the Traffic Congestion Relief Program shall be deemed complete and final, and funding levels shall be based on actual amounts requested by the designated lead applicant pursuant to Section 14556.12. Projects without approved applications in accordance with Section 14556.12 shall no longer be eligible for program funding. Traffic Congestion Relief Program savings shall be transferred to other transportation accounts for the purposes specified in Section 16321.

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2017, Ch. 5, Sec. 8. (SB 1) Effective April 28, 2017.)

division: 3. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT

title: 2. GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

chapter: 4.5. The Traffic Congestion Relief Act of 2000

article: 5. Eligible Projects


text:
The grant authorized under paragraph (32) of subdivision (a) of Section 14556.40 shall be allocated as follows:

(a) (1) Two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) to defray the administrative costs of the North Coast Railroad Authority, allocated directly to the authority as directed by the commission at its first scheduled meeting immediately upon enactment of the Budget Act of 2000.

(2) Two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) to defray the administrative costs of the authority, allocated directly to the authority as directed by the commission within six months from the date of enactment of the Budget Act of 2000.

(3) Five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) to defray the administrative costs of the authority, allocated to the authority as directed by the commission, within one year from the date of enactment of the Budget Act of 2000, if the commission determines that additional funding is needed by the authority as directed by the commission at its first scheduled meeting for administrative costs.

(b) Six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) to fund completion of the authority’s rail line from Lombard to Willits, allocated directly to the authority immediately upon enactment of the Budget Act of 2000.

(c) One million dollars ($1,000,000) to fund completion of the authority’s rail line from Willits to Arcata, allocated to the authority as directed by the commission, within six months from the date of enactment of the Budget Act of 2000.

(d) Five million dollars ($5,000,000) to fund the upgrade of the authority’s rail line to Class II or III status, allocated to the authority as directed by the commission.

(e) Four million one hundred thousand dollars ($4,100,000) for environmental remediation projects, allocated to the authority as directed by the commission, within six months from the date of enactment of the Budget Act of 2000.

(f) Ten million dollars ($10,000,000) for the authority’s debt reduction, allocated to the authority as directed by the commission, within six months from the date of enactment of the Budget Act of 2000.

(g) One million eight hundred thousand dollars ($1,800,000) for use by the authority as local match funds, allocated to the authority as directed by the commission.

(h) Five million five hundred thousand dollars ($5,500,000) to fund repayment of the authority’s federal loan obligations, allocated to the authority as directed by the commission.

(i) Thirty-one million dollars ($31,000,000) for long-term stabilization projects, allocated to the authority as directed by the commission.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 2000, Ch. 656, Sec. 6. Effective September 26, 2000.)

article: 6. Miscellaneous Provisions

path: 2. GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA > 3. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT > 4.5. The Traffic Congestion Relief Act of 2000 > 6. Miscellaneous Provisions


text:
(a) Before grants from the fund may be allocated to any of the three Alameda Corridor East Projects identified in paragraphs (54), (55), and (73) of subdivision (a) of Section 14556.40, a report shall be completed and submitted to the commission within one year of the operative date of this section. The report shall be prepared by a team consisting of the lead applicants for those projects and the Riverside County Transportation Commission. The report shall address regional mobility needs as well as regional, state, and national economic impacts of the corridor. The team shall also evaluate and assess the technical merits, determine the phasing and delivery schedule, and identify a financing strategy for the proposed corridor improvements. Based on the good faith participation of the stakeholders, the commission shall allocate some or all of the available funds to one or more of the lead applicants for specific projects within the corridor that meet the requirements under this chapter.

(b) Funds may be allocated from the fund to produce the report required under this section.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 2000, Ch. 656, Sec. 7. Effective September 26, 2000.)

article: 6. Miscellaneous Provisions


text:
(a) The Legislature finds and declares that the Governor has issued a proclamation pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 1 of Article XIXB of the California Constitution declaring that the transfer of revenues from the General Fund to the Transportation Investment Fund during the 2003–04 fiscal year pursuant to paragraph (a) of Section 1 of Article XIXB would have a significant negative fiscal impact on the range of functions of government funded by the General Fund of the state.

(b) Pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 1 of Article XIXB, the transfer of revenues from the General Fund to the Transportation Investment Fund that would otherwise be required under paragraph (a) of Section 1 of Article XIXB is hereby partially suspended for the 2003–04 fiscal year. The amount of the transfer for the 2003–04 fiscal year shall be two hundred eighty-nine million dollars ($289,000,000).

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2003, Ch. 223, Sec. 1. Effective August 11, 2003.)

path: 2. GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA > 3. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT > 5. Suspension of Article XIX B Transfers


text:
(a) Notwithstanding Sections 14556.5 and 14556.6, the money transferred from the Transportation Investment Fund to the Traffic Congestion Relief Fund during the 2003–04 fiscal year, which amount is two hundred eighty-nine million dollars ($289,000,000) pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 14557 and paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 7104 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, shall be allocated as follows:

(1) One hundred eighty-nine million dollars ($189,000,000) is appropriated to the department, for expenditure as directed by the commission, for the Traffic Congestion Relief Program, of which up to thirty-one million dollars ($31,000,000) shall be available to the department for capital outlay support for projects in that program.

(2) One hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) shall be transferred to the State Highway Account, as partial repayment of loans made to the Traffic Congestion Relief Fund from the State Highway Account pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 14556.8, for expenditure by the department as directed by the commission on transportation capital improvement projects included in the State Transportation Improvement Program.

(b) The transfer from the Transportation Investment Fund to the Traffic Congestion Relief Fund under subdivision (a) shall occur on a quarterly basis, with one quarter of total funds available for the fiscal year to be transferred each quarter.

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2003, Ch. 224, Sec. 1. Effective August 11, 2003.)

chapter: 5. Suspension of Article XIX B Transfers


text:
(a) The Legislature finds and declares that the Governor has issued a proclamation pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 1 of Article XIXB of the California Constitution declaring that the transfer of revenues from the General Fund to the Transportation Investment Fund during the 2004–05 fiscal year pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1 of Article XIXB would have a significant negative fiscal impact on the range of functions of government funded by the General Fund of the state.

(b) Pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 1 of Article XIXB, the transfer of revenues from the General Fund to the Transportation Investment Fund that would otherwise be required under subdivision (a) of Section 1 of Article XIXB is hereby suspended for the 2004–05 fiscal year.

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2004, Ch. 210, Sec. 1. Effective August 5, 2004.)


text:
(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

(1) Sea level rise and other climate-fueled hazards are threatening the state’s critical surface transportation infrastructure and surrounding communities.

(2) Large-scale investment will be needed to make the state’s transportation assets and its communities resilient to climate hazards. In the San Francisco Bay area alone, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and Association of Bay Area Governments estimate a nineteen-billion-dollar ($19,000,000,000) cost to adapt for just two feet of sea level rise.

(3) Since 2015, the state enacted several laws and took administrative action directed to incorporate climate adaptation into transportation investment decisions. Executive Order B-30-15 requires the consideration of climate change in all state investment decisions; Senate Bill 379 (Chapter 608 of the Statutes of 2015) requires local governments to incorporate climate adaptation and resiliency strategies into general plans; and the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5 of the Statutes of 2017) includes funding for climate change adaptation planning grants.

(4) Critical multistakeholder adaptation planning work has already begun around the state.

(5) The federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 (IIJA) (Public Law 117-58) increases California’s National Highway Performance Program funds to twelve billion eight hundred million dollars ($12,800,000,000) over the five-year funding period and newly allows those dollars to be spent on resilience, including an allowance for up to 15 percent of the funds to be spent on protective features anywhere on the federal aid highway system.

(6) The IIJA also creates a new resilience formula program, the Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation (PROTECT) program, which provides California with approximately six hundred thirty million dollars ($630,000,000) over five years. These funds can be used for planning and resilience improvements that protect surface transportation assets.

(b) The intent of this chapter is to provide for the funding of the identification of climate vulnerabilities, the assessment of the risks created by those vulnerabilities, and the planning, development, and implementation of transportation projects that adapt to those risks and support the holistic and comprehensive adaptation to climate change.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 131, Sec. 78. (AB 1754) Effective January 1, 2024.)

path: 2. GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA > 3. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT > 6. Transportation Infrastructure: Climate Adaptation Grant Programs


text:
For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply:

(a) “Adaptation Planning Guide” means the document created and updated by the Office of Emergency Services, in coordination with the Office of Planning and Research and the Natural Resources Agency, pursuant to Section 71356 of the Public Resources Code.

(b) “California State Adaptation Strategy” means the state’s climate adaptation strategy updated pursuant to Section 71153 of the Public Resources Code.

(c) “Local agency” means any of the following:

(1) A transportation planning agency described in Section 29532 or 29532.1.

(2) A county transportation commission established under Section 130050, 130050.1, or 130050.2 of the Public Utilities Code.

(3) Any other local or regional transportation entity that is designated by statute as a regional transportation agency.

(4) A joint exercise of powers authority established pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1, with the consent of a transportation planning agency or a county transportation commission for the jurisdiction in which the transportation project will be developed.

(5) A local transportation authority created or designated pursuant to Division 12.5 (commencing with Section 131000) or Division 19 (commencing with Section 180000) of the Public Utilities Code.

(6) The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority established pursuant to Part 12 (commencing with Section 100000) of Division 10 of the Public Utilities Code.

(7) A city, county, or a city and a county.

(8) A federally recognized Native American tribe.

(d) “Natural infrastructure” has the same meaning as defined in subsection (a) of Section 101 of Title 23 of the United States Code.

(e) “PROTECT program” means the federal Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation program established pursuant to Section 176 of Title 23 of the United States Code.

(f) “Resilience improvement plan” means a resilience improvement plan developed as part of the PROTECT program pursuant to Section 176 of Title 23 of the United States Code.

(g) “Under-resourced community” has the same meaning as defined in Section 71130 of the Public Resources Code.

(h) “Vulnerable community” has the same meaning as the definition of “vulnerable communities” that was adopted by the Integrated Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Program Technical Advisory Council at the council’s April 2, 2018, meeting and recorded in the resource guide published by the Office of Planning and Research in July 2018 titled “Defining Vulnerable Communities in the Context of Climate Adaptation.”

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2022, Ch. 71, Sec. 3. (SB 198) Effective June 30, 2022.)

chapter: 6. Transportation Infrastructure: Climate Adaptation Grant Programs


text:
(a) The Transportation Infrastructure Climate Adaptation Strategy Grant Program is hereby established as a competitive grant program to be awarded and administered by the department to provide funding to local agencies for both of the following purposes:

(1) To identify transportation-related climate vulnerabilities through the development of climate adaptation plans, including climate action plans, hazard mitigation plans, safety elements of required general plans, and resilience improvement plans.

(2) Consistent with the principles of the California State Adaptation Strategy, the resilience improvement plan prepared by the department pursuant to Section 14563, and any applicable regional resilience improvement plans, to identify ways to incorporate transportation-related climate adaptation needs into existing transportation plans.

(b) Upon appropriation of funds by the Legislature, including funds allocated to this program from the PROTECT program, the department shall allocate funds for grants to local agencies for any of the following purposes to adapt to the changing climate:

(1) Climate change adaptation planning that identifies transportation system vulnerabilities and climate-related risks to existing transportation infrastructure, including resilience improvement plans.

(2) Climate adaptation planning that identifies projects to adapt to specific identified climate risks to existing transportation infrastructure.

(3) Planning for specific climate projects that can be programmed in existing local or regional transportation plans.

(c) The department shall administer the program in consultation with the Transportation Agency, the commission, the Natural Resources Agency, the Office of Planning and Research, the Integrated Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Program Technical Advisory Council, and other state or local agencies that have adopted climate adaptation plans or strategies. The department shall ensure that, to the extent practical, the program is coordinated with other state-administered programs that fund climate adaptation activities.

(d) The department may allocate funds to local agencies pursuant to subdivision (b) by providing grants for any of the following:

(1) Technical assistance for under-resourced and vulnerable communities.

(2) Specific work within a local agency’s climate adaptation plans, climate action plans, hazard mitigation plans, or safety elements of required general plans, that will lead to the identification and development of capital projects that can be programmed as part of local or regional transportation plans.

(3) Development and preparation of planning documents for transportation capital projects, or projects that may use natural infrastructure or provide multiple benefits, that adapt to identified climate vulnerabilities and that can be programmed through an existing local or regional transportation plan.

(e) (1) The department shall develop guidelines for the implementation of this program. The guidelines for this program are exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1).

(2) The guidelines shall require that each administrative cycle considers climate equity across regions of the state, and considers adaptation strategies with multiple cobenefits that support other state goals and that benefit adaptation efforts, in order to identify, develop, and implement capital improvement projects that meet both of the following requirements:

(A) The project is aligned with state and local strategies for adapting to climate change impacts, including the resilience improvement plan prepared by the department pursuant to Section 14563 and applicable regional resilience improvement plans.

(B) The project is consistent with the principles of the California State Adaptation Strategy, as well as relevant climate action plans, hazard mitigation plans, and safety elements of required general plans.

(3) The guidelines shall require that funding to local agencies is made for the identification of climate vulnerabilities, identification of specific climate risks to transportation infrastructure, and development of projects that correct or adapt to an identified climate risk to transportation infrastructure.

(4) The guidelines shall require that any work funded by this program shall include a multistakeholder process that provides an opportunity for public input from communities potentially impacted by any projects identified or developed as part of the grant.

(f) Nothing in this section shall limit the department from awarding funds to more than one phase of the same project, but no single project shall be awarded all of the funding available under the program.


text:
(a) The State Transportation Infrastructure Climate Adaptation Program is hereby established, to be administered by the department, for purposes of planning, developing, and implementing projects adapting state transportation infrastructure to climate change.

(b) (1) Upon appropriation of funds by the Legislature, including funds allocated to this program from the PROTECT program, the department shall prepare the resilience improvement plan for the state and shall develop a program of its top priority climate adaptation projects identified through its Adaptation Priorities Report process that will result in more resilient transportation infrastructure. The department shall submit projects in this program to the commission for adoption.

(2) In developing the program of projects pursuant to paragraph (1), the department shall consider all of the following:

(A) The department shall consult the 2020 and 2021 adaptation priority reports or any subsequent updates.

(B) The degree of risk for recurring damage or asset failure due to climate threats.

(C) The benefits of the project to preserving or enhancing regional or statewide mobility, economy, goods movement, and safety, and other benefits associated with protecting the asset.

(D) The benefits of the project to preserving or protecting adjacent communities, the environment, and other critical infrastructure.

(E) The degree to which the project incorporates environmental equity, protects vulnerable and under-resourced communities, and provides benefits to underserved communities, consistent with the California State Adaptation Strategy.

(3) In developing the program of projects pursuant to paragraph (1), the department may also consider, as secondary factors, cobenefits including reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases and vehicle miles traveled.

(4) In developing the program of projects pursuant to paragraph (1), the department may prioritize projects with local sponsors or additional sources of funding. The department may consider joint proposals for projects on the state highway system that are also eligible for funding under the program established pursuant to Section 14564.

(c) No later than April 1 of each year, the department shall provide the Legislature with a list of projects funded pursuant to this section, consistent with Section 9795.

(d) The department may use funds appropriated for this program to fund the development and implementation of projects described in subdivision (b) that are included in the State Highway Operation and Protection Program.

(e) The department may use funds appropriated for this program to develop project initiation documents for the purposes of providing engineering details that document the scope, cost, and schedule for projects described in subdivision (b).

(f) The department shall develop the program of projects pursuant to subdivision (b) in consultation with the Transportation Agency, the commission, the Natural Resources Agency, the Office of Planning and Research, the Integrated Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Program Technical Advisory Council, and other relevant state or local agencies that have adopted climate adaptation plans or strategies. The department shall ensure that, to the extent practical, the program established pursuant to this section is coordinated with other state-administered programs that fund climate adaptation activities.

(g) A state highway system project funded pursuant to this program shall, to the extent practicable, be consistent with the state’s asset management plan prepared pursuant to Section 14526.4.

(h) Nothing in this section shall limit the department from programming funds to more than one phase of the same project, but no single project shall be awarded all of the funding available under the program.


text:
(a) The Local Transportation Infrastructure Climate Adaptation Project Program is hereby established, to be administered by the commission, for purposes of developing and implementing projects adapting local transportation infrastructure to climate change.

(b) Upon appropriation of funds by the Legislature, including funds allocated to this program from the PROTECT program, the commission shall allocate funds for grants to local agencies for the development and implementation of projects that are intended to adapt to the changing climate and that meet all of the following criteria:

(1) The project increases climate resiliency and protects at-risk transportation infrastructure using California’s climate projections, as specified in Planning and Investing for a Resilient California: A Guidebook for State Agencies.

(2) The project is consistent with state, regional, or local climate adaptation reports, plans, and the Adaptation Planning Guide, including meeting the climate resiliency goals of the region where the project is located.

(3) The local agency conducts outreach to under-resourced and vulnerable communities related to the proposed project, consistent with the California State Adaptation Strategy.

(4) The project incorporates environmental equity, protects vulnerable and under-resourced communities, and provides meaningful benefits to underserved communities, consistent with the California State Adaptation Strategy.

(c) (1) The commission shall develop guidelines for the implementation of this program. The guidelines for this program are exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1).

(2) The guidelines shall consider project prioritization based on all of the following factors:

(A) The degree of risk for recurring damage or asset failure due to climate threats.

(B) The benefits of the project to preserving or enhancing regional or statewide mobility, economy, goods movement, and safety, and other benefits associated with protecting the asset.

(C) The benefits of the project to preserving or protecting adjacent communities, the environment, and other critical infrastructure.

(D) The degree to which the project incorporates environmental equity, protects vulnerable and under-resourced communities, and provides benefits to underserved communities, consistent with the California State Adaptation Strategy.

(3) The guidelines may also consider, as secondary project prioritization criteria, cobenefits such as reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled.

(4) The guidelines shall require that each administrative cycle considers climate equity across regions of the state, and considers adaptation strategies that benefit adaptation efforts, in order to develop and implement capital improvement projects that meet both of the following requirements:

(A) The project is aligned with state and local strategies for adapting to climate change impacts.

(B) The project is consistent with the principles of the California State Adaptation Strategy, as well as relevant climate action plans, hazard mitigation plans, and safety elements of required general plans.

(5) The guidelines shall require that funding to local agencies is made for the development and implementation of transportation capital projects that correct or adapt to an identified climate risk to transportation infrastructure.

(6) The guidelines shall authorize, in addition to conventional transportation infrastructure projects, transportation-focused capital projects funded through this program to use natural infrastructure or provide multiple benefits if the project is consistent with applicable climate adaptation plans and necessary to increase the resilience of transportation infrastructure.

(7) The guidelines shall require that any projects funded by this program be developed with a multistakeholder process that provides an opportunity for public input from communities potentially impacted by the project.

(d) An application submitted by a local agency for funding through the grant program shall include at a minimum all of the following:

(1) An explanation of how the proposed transportation project adapts existing infrastructure to an identified climate risk.

(2) An explanation of how the project incorporates the use of California’s climate projections as specified in the Adaptation Planning Guide and other relevant state guidance documents.

(3) Identification of strategies and actions that demonstrate that the proposed project is consistent with applicable state, regional, or local climate adaptation plans or reports.

(4) An explanation of the outreach that the local agency conducted to under-resourced and vulnerable communities related to the proposed project.

(5) Identification of measures to improve equity and protect under-resourced and vulnerable communities in actions to meet the region’s climate resiliency goals.

(6) Demonstration that the project is consistent with an applicable sustainable communities strategy adopted as part of a regional transportation plan pursuant to Section 65080.

(e) An application may be submitted for a project that is also eligible for funding under Section 14563 if it meets the requirements of Section 14563 and is considered for programming by the department subject to the requirements of that section.

(f) The commission shall administer the program in consultation with the Transportation Agency, the department, the Natural Resources Agency, the Office of Planning and Research, the Integrated Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Program Technical Advisory Council, and other state or local agencies that have adopted climate assessments adaptation plans or strategies. The commission shall ensure that, to the extent practical, the program is coordinated with other state-administered programs that fund climate adaptation activities.

(g) Nothing in this section shall limit the commission from awarding funds to more than one phase of the same project, but no single project shall be awarded all of the funding available under the program


text:
(a) (1) A local agency that receives an allocation of funds pursuant to Section 14562 shall submit a report, in the form and manner prescribed by the department, to the department by April 1 of the fiscal year following the receipt of those funds, and annually thereafter until those funds are expended. The report shall contain the status of the planning receiving funding from the grant program. The department shall make a report submitted pursuant to this paragraph publicly available on its internet website.

(2) A local agency that receives an allocation of funds pursuant to Section 14564 shall submit a report, in the form and manner prescribed by the commission, to the commission by April 1 of the fiscal year following the receipt of those funds, and annually thereafter until those funds are expended. The report shall contain the status of the project receiving funding from the grant program. The commission shall make a report submitted pursuant to this paragraph publicly available on its internet website.

(b) (1) For purposes of Sections 14562 and 14564, the department and commission, as appropriate, shall maintain records of the following information and shall make that information publicly available on its internet website, as applicable:

(A) The application status for each grant applicant.

(B) The information described in subdivision (a) for each recipient of grant program funds.

(2) The department or commission, as applicable, may request additional information, as needed, from a grant applicant or recipient to meet other applicable reporting or audit requirements.

(c) No later than July 1, 2028, the department and each local agency that receives an allocation of grant funds pursuant to this chapter shall submit a five-year performance report on the use of those funds to the commission. In the report, the department or the local agency, as applicable, shall evaluate the actions it took in support of its proposed uses of those funds, as specified in the grant application.

(d) The commission and the department, as applicable, may monitor expenditures and activities of a grant recipient, as deemed necessary, to ensure compliance with requirements of this chapter.

(e) (1) The department shall post a report on its internet website by April 1 of the fiscal year following its receipt of funds pursuant to this chapter, and annually thereafter, until those funds are expended. The report shall contain the status of the department’s project initiation documents and projects receiving funding under this chapter.

(2) No later than July 1, 2028, the department shall post on its internet website a five-year performance report on its use of funds for its project initiation documents and projects receiving funding under this chapter.


text: The Legislature declares that a centralization of business management functions and services of state government is necessary to take advantage of specialized techniques and skills, provide uniform management practices, and to insure a continuing high level of efficiency and economy. A Department of General Services is created to provide centralized services including, but not limited to, planning, acquisition, construction, and maintenance of state buildings and property; purchasing; printing; architectural services; administrative hearings; government claims; and accounting services. The Department of General Services shall develop and enforce policy and procedures and shall institute or cause the institution of those investigations and proceedings as it deems proper to assure effective operation of all functions performed by the department and to conserve the rights and interests of the state.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 31, Sec. 126. (SB 836) Effective June 27, 2016.)

chapter: 1. General Provisions

path: 2. GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA > 3. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT > 1. General Provisions


text: There is in the state government, in the Government Operations Agency, the Department of General Services.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 2013, Ch. 352, Sec. 292. (AB 1317) Effective September 26, 2013. Operative July 1, 2013, by Sec. 543 of Ch. 352.)


text: The Department of General Services is under the control of an executive officer known as the Director of General Services. As used in this part, “department” and “director” refer to the Department of General Services and the Director of General Services, respectively, unless the context otherwise requires.

history: (History: Added by Stats. 1965, Ch. 371.)


text: The Director of General Services is appointed by and holds office at the pleasure of the Governor. The appointment of the director is subject to confirmation by the Senate. The annual salary of the director is provided for by Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 11550) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of this code.


text: Commencing no later than August 1, 2005, and no later than August 1 annually thereafter, the Department of General Services shall submit to the Department of Finance a proposal that reconciles the current fiscal year rates for service fees charged by the Department of General Services to state agencies, and details any adjustments proposed for budget fiscal year rates to be included in the Governor’s Budget.

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2004, Ch. 227, Sec. 45. Effective August 16, 2004.)


text: The director shall perform all duties, exercise all powers and jurisdiction, assume and discharge all responsibilities, and carry out and effect all purposes vested by law in the office.


text: Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 11150) of Part 1 applies to the director and the director is the head of a department within the meaning of the chapter.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 1984, Ch. 144, Sec. 116.)


text:
For the purpose of administration, the director shall organize the department with the approval of the Governor, in the manner that he deems necessary properly to segregate and conduct the work of the department.

The director may arrange and classify the work of the department and with the approval of the Governor may create such divisions and subdivisions as may be necessary, and change or abolish them from time to time.


text: Whenever any statute requires by the use of the word or words “approve,” “approval,” “authorize,” or “authorization,” the director of the department to approve or authorize any act or transaction, the approval or authorization shall be deemed to have been given only if given in writing by the director, the deputy director, or by some other officer or employee of the department acting pursuant to written authority of the director. The term “in writing” includes a secured electronic signature, whereby an electronically produced document may be signed electronically by the authorized signatory who possesses a secured electronic password available only to the signatory or his or her designee.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 1994, Ch. 1044, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 1995.)


text: Notwithstanding Section 11043, the department may employ such persons as are necessary to provide house legal counsel for the department. These persons may advise the director, officers, employees, boards, commissions, and offices of the department concerning legal affairs of the department. The official legal adviser concerning the department’s interdepartmental powers, functions, and relationships with other departments is the Attorney General. House legal counsel for the department when authorized by the Attorney General may represent the department and the state in litigation concerning affairs of the department.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 1984, Ch. 144, Sec. 117.)


text: The department may prepare, publish, and issue such printed pamphlets and bulletins as the director deems necessary for the dissemination of information to the public concerning the activities of the department. Funds available for support of the department may, with the approval of the Department of Finance, be used to pay the cost of preparation, publication, and distribution.


text:
(a) The department shall commit itself to achieve improved levels of performance, as specified in this section, by focusing its efforts on enhancing the value of the services it delivers.

(b) The department shall commit itself to providing both of the following:

(1) Services that the Legislature or Governor requires state agencies to purchase from the department.

(2) Services that state agencies are not required to purchase from the department, but that the department can provide on a cost-competitive basis.

(c) Notwithstanding any other law, the director or the director’s designee, in lieu of the Director of Finance, may approve DGS Form 22 and DGS Form 220, including the extension of time to expend transferred funds, the transfer of funds from one work order to another, and the Return of Funds Document.

(d) Notwithstanding Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 13940) of Part 4, the director or the director’s designee may approve “relief from accountability” for debts owed to the department up to five thousand dollars ($5,000) when the department determines it cannot collect the debts or when the cost of collection exceeds the amount of the debt.

(e) Notwithstanding Section 2807 of the Penal Code, the director or the director’s designee may procure goods from the private sector even though the goods may be available from the California Correctional Training and Rehabilitation Authority, when in the director’s discretion, it is cost beneficial to do so and if the director or the director’s designee continues to include the authority in soliciting quotations for goods.

(f) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) of Section 948 and Section 965, the director or the director’s designee, in lieu of the Director of Finance, may certify funds for payment of all legal settlements and tort claims for which the department already has sufficient expenditure authority and funds without the need for augmentation.

(g) Notwithstanding Section 965.2, the director or the director’s designee, in lieu of the Director of Finance, may certify funds for payment for all legal court settlements for projects funded from the Architecture Revolving Fund, if a sufficient fund balance exists in the work order to pay the claim and the payment does not require a budget augmentation to complete the project.

(h) Notwithstanding Section 14957, the director or the director’s designee, in lieu of the Director of Finance, may approve the deposit of checks directly into the Architecture Revolving Fund. The department shall notify the Department of Finance within 30 days of the date that the department makes such a deposit.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch. 241, Sec. 13. (SB 857) Effective January 1, 2026.)


text: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for state printing procurement purposes, printing is not considered a personal service contract as defined in Section 19130.

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 1124, Sec. 17. Effective September 30, 2002.)


text: The Department of the California Highway Patrol shall present to the host agency or family member designated by the host agency of any peace officer who is killed in the line of duty in California, the flag that was flown at half-staff over the State Capitol Building in memory of the officer and a memorial certificate.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 305, Sec. 24. Effective January 1, 1997.)


text: Each state agency that is protected by the Department of the California Highway Patrol, those state agencies currently being protected by contract private security companies, or those state agencies currently under contract with a local governmental law enforcement agency for general law enforcement services, excluding all current mutual aid agreements, shall, as soon as practical, report to the Department of the California Highway Patrol all crimes and criminally caused property damage on state-owned or state-leased property where state employees are discharging their duties. This section shall not apply to incidents that result in the filing of Incidence Memoranda issued by the Parole Divisions of the Department of Corrections and the Department of the Youth Authority.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 2012, Ch. 728, Sec. 65. (SB 71) Effective January 1, 2013.)


text: The director and the civil executive officers of the department have the powers of a peace officer in all parts of the state in enforcing any lawful order of the department.


text:
(a) The department has general powers of supervision over all matters concerning the financial and business policies of the state in regard to the duties, powers, responsibilities, and jurisdiction specifically vested in the department. Whenever the department deems it necessary, or at the instance of the Governor, it shall institute or cause the institution of those investigations and proceedings as it deems proper to conserve the rights and interests of the state.

(b) The Department of the California Highway Patrol has jurisdiction over those matters related to the security of state officers, property, and occupants of state property. The Department of the California Highway Patrol may also assist the department in the department’s investigations conducted pursuant to subdivision (a).

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 305, Sec. 26. Effective January 1, 1997.)


text:
(a) Where the Legislature directs or authorizes the department to maintain, develop, or prescribe processes, procedures, or policies in connection with the administration of its duties under this chapter, Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 14650), Section 6611 of the Public Contract Code, or Part 2 (commencing with Section 10100) of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code, the action by the department shall be exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340), Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 11370), Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 11400), and Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500)). This section shall apply to actions taken by the department with respect to the State Administrative Manual and the State Contracting Manual.

(b) To the extent permitted by the United States and California Constitutions, subdivision (a) also applies to actions taken by the department prior to January 1, 1999, with respect to competitive procurement in the State Administrative Manual and the State Contracting Manual.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 2013, Ch. 28, Sec. 15. (SB 71) Effective June 27, 2013. Operative July 1, 2013, by Sec. 93 of Ch. 28.)


text: The director may exempt from his or her approval or from approval of the department any transactions involving not more than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for which such approval is required by statute whenever, in his or her judgment, such exemption is appropriate and in the best interests of the state. Written notice of exemptions shall be given to the Controller.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 1981, Ch. 640, Sec. 1.)


text:
The Office of the State Architect and the California Building Standards Commission, in consultation with offices and divisions within the Department of General Services, and with the Department of the California Highway Patrol, shall jointly adopt regulations in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations to establish a standard of lighting for parking lots at the University of California, California State University, and California Community Colleges. This standard shall be adopted and submitted to the California Building Standards Commission for approval on or before June 30, 1991, and published by the commission in the 1992 triennial publication of the California Building Code.

The Office of the State Architect shall also adopt regulations in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations to establish the Illumination Engineering Society Handbook recommendations as the standard lighting level for primary campus walkways used at night at the University of California, California State University, and California Community Colleges. These regulations shall be adopted and submitted to the California Building Standards Commission for approval on or before June 30, 1991, and published by the commission in the 1992 triennial publication of the California Building Code.

This section shall not apply to the University of California unless the Regents of the University of California, by resolution, makes it applicable.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 305, Sec. 27. Effective January 1, 1997.)


text:
The Department of General Services may require from all agencies of the state permitted or charged by law with the handling of public money or its equivalent, financial and statistical reports, duly verified, covering the period of each fiscal year.

When necessary, the department may require special reports from any such state agency. These special reports shall be filed with the department without delay.


text: The Department of General Services may examine all records, files, documents, accounts, and all financial affairs of every agency mentioned in Section 14618. It may enter any public office or institution in this state and examine any records, files, books, papers or documents contained therein or belonging thereto for the purpose of making such examination. Every state agency shall permit such examination and upon demand shall produce without unnecessary delay all books, contracts, and papers in its offices, and furnish information touching books, papers, contracts, and other matters pertaining to the agency.


text: There is in the department a general services planning officer, a procurement officer, and an executive officer of the Office of Public School Construction. Each officer or executive director may be appointed by the Governor, upon recommendation of the director, and shall serve at the pleasure of the director. His or her salary shall be fixed by the director in accordance with law. Each officer or executive officer shall have any duties that may be assigned to him or her by, and shall be responsible to, the director for the performance of those duties. It is the intent of the Legislature that this section is not to result in an increase in the number of positions in the department.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 1994, Ch. 1228, Sec. 4. Effective January 1, 1995.)


text: The department has the possession and control of all records, books, papers, offices, equipment, supplies, money, funds, appropriations, land and other property, real or personal, held for the benefit or use of state agencies within the department.

history: (History: Added by renumbering Section 13010 by Stats. 1965, Ch. 371.)


text: The director may make available to elected state officials, without charge, state parking facilities for the parking of the privately owned cars of such officials.

history: (History: Added by renumbering Section 13011 by Stats. 1965, Ch. 371.)


text: The department shall engage competent artists to paint oil portraits of all Governors of California whose portraits have not been painted, and a portrait of each Governor upon his retirement from office. The portraits shall be framed and hung in appropriate places in the State Capitol.

history: (History: Added by renumbering Section 13072 by Stats. 1965, Ch. 371.)


text: The department may render advisory, investigational, or other similar service to any city, county, district or any other political subdivision of the state, or to the federal government upon such terms and conditions as may be satisfactory to the director.

history: (History: Added by renumbering Section 13073 by Stats. 1965, Ch. 371.)


text: The director may require any person who has charge of, handles or has access to any state property to file an official bond in an amount to be fixed by him.

history: (History: Added by renumbering Section 13075 by Stats. 1965, Ch. 371.)


text:
(a) Notwithstanding any other law, in order to comply with applicable federal and state requirements, the Department of General Services may conduct criminal background checks of an employee, prospective employee, contractor, agent, volunteer, subcontractor, or employee of a contractor whose duties or responsibilities may give them access to any of the following:

(1) Criminal offender record history information.

(2) Federal tax information.

(3) Non-anonymized confidential information, personally identifiable information, personal health information, or financial information contained in the information systems or devices of the department or other sensitive and secure facilities and buildings such that a criminal background check is required.

(b) The fingerprint images and associated information of an employee, prospective employee, contractor, contractor, agent, volunteer, subcontractor, or employee of a contractor whose duties may give them access to the information specified in subdivision (a), or any person who assumes those duties, may be furnished to the Department of Justice pursuant to subdivision (u) of Section 11105 of the Penal Code for obtaining information as to the existence and content of any of the following:

(1) State or federal convictions.

(2) State or federal arrests.

(3) A record of state or federal arrests for which the Department of Justice establishes that the person was released on bail or on the person’s own recognizance pending trial or appeal.

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2024, Ch. 997, Sec. 11. (AB 179) Effective September 30, 2024.)


text:
With the approval of the department, state agencies may install and operate toll-free telephone lease lines to provide access by the public and local governmental agencies. The department shall adopt guidelines for the use of toll-free lease lines by state agencies as are necessary to promote the efficient use thereof. Following approval of the department, the toll-free telephone number shall be published at least once in the California Regulatory Notice Register.

The information which is made available on toll-free lease lines shall be accessible by both tone dial and rotary dial telephones.

history: (History: Amended by Stats. 1990, Ch. 393, Sec. 1.)


text:
(a) The California State Sheriffs Search and Rescue Coordinators, or any successor entity, may plan and construct a memorial in the Capitol Historic Region, in consultation with the department, to honor California search-and-rescue volunteers who have died in the line of duty.

(b) The Search and Rescue Memorial Review Committee is hereby established and shall include as members all of the following:

(1) The Director of the Department of General Services, or his or her designee.

(2) The State Historic Preservation Officer, or his or her designee.

(3) A Member of the Assembly appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly.

(4) A Member of the Senate appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules.

(c) The committee shall consult with the California State Sheriffs Search and Rescue Coordinators to identify an appropriate location for the memorial in the Capitol Historic Region and review a memorial design.

(d) The department, in consultation with the California State Sheriffs Search and Rescue Coordinators, shall accomplish the following goals:

(1) Review of the preliminary design plans to identify potential maintenance concerns.

(2) Ensure Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.) compliance, and other safety concerns.

(3) Review and approval of proper California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code) documents prepared for work at the designated historic property.

(4) Review of final construction documents to ensure that all requirements are met.

(5) Prepare the right-of-entry permit outlining the final area of work, final construction documents, construction plans, the contractor hired to perform the work, insurance, bonding, provisions for damage to state property, and inspection requirements.

(6) Prepare a maintenance agreement outlining the California State Sheriffs Search and Rescue Coordinators’ responsibility for the long-term maintenance of the memorial due to aging, vandalism, or relocation.

(7) Inspect the construction performed by the contractor selected by the California State Sheriffs Search and Rescue Coordinators.

(e) If the California State Sheriffs Search and Rescue Coordinators undertake responsibility to construct a memorial under this section, it shall, in consultation with the department, establish a schedule for the design, construction, and dedication of the memorial, implement procedures to solicit designs for the memorial and devise a selection process for the choice of the design, and establish a program for the dedication of the memorial.

(f) The department and the Search and Rescue Memorial Review Committee shall approve the design of the memorial.

(g) If the California State Sheriffs Search and Rescue Coordinators undertake responsibility to construct a memorial under this section, it shall not begin construction of the memorial until the master plan of the State Capitol Park is approved and adopted by the Joint Committee on Rules and the Department of Finance has determined that sufficient private funding is available to construct and maintain the memorial.

(h) The planning, construction, and maintenance of the memorial shall be funded exclusively through private donations to a nonprofit foundation, the Search and Rescue Memorial Foundation, to be established for that purpose.

(i) If the California State Sheriffs Search and Rescue Coordinators undertake responsibility to construct a memorial under this section, it shall sign a maintenance agreement with the state, as created under paragraph (6) of subdivision (d), to maintain the memorial with private contributions.

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2007, Ch. 311, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2008.)


text:
(a) The Military Order of the Purple Heart, Capitol Chapter 385, or any successor entity, may plan and construct a memorial in the Capitol Historic Region, in consultation with the department, to honor California residents who have been awarded the Purple Heart.

(b) The Purple Heart Memorial Review Committee is hereby established and shall include as members all of the following:

(1) The Director of General Services, or his or her designee.

(2) The State Historic Preservation Officer, or his or her designee.

(3) A Member of the Assembly appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly.

(4) A Member of the Senate appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules.

(c) The committee shall consult with the Military Order of the Purple Heart, Capitol Chapter 385, to identify an appropriate location for the memorial in the Capitol Historic Region and review a memorial design.

(d) The department, in consultation with the Military Order of the Purple Heart, Capitol Chapter 385, shall accomplish the following goals:

(1) Review of the preliminary design plans to identify potential maintenance concerns.

(2) Ensure Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.) compliance, and other safety concerns.

(3) Review and approval of proper California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code) documents prepared for work at the designated historic property.

(4) Review of final construction documents to ensure that all requirements are met.

(5) Prepare the right-of-entry permit outlining the final area of work, final construction documents, construction plans, the contractor hired to perform the work, insurance, bonding, provisions for damage to state property, and inspection requirements.

(6) Prepare a maintenance agreement outlining the Military Order of the Purple Heart, Capitol Chapter 385’s responsibility for the long-term maintenance of the memorial due to aging, vandalism, or relocation.

(7) Inspect the construction performed by the contractor selected by the Military Order of the Purple Heart, Capitol Chapter 385.

(e) If the Military Order of the Purple Heart, Capitol Chapter 385 undertakes responsibility to construct a memorial under this section, it shall, in consultation with the department, establish a schedule for the design, construction, and dedication of the memorial, implement procedures to solicit designs for the memorial and devise a selection process for the choice of the design, and establish a program for the dedication of the memorial.

(f) The department and the Purple Heart Memorial Review Committee shall approve the design of the memorial.

(g) If the Military Order of the Purple Heart, Capitol Chapter 385 undertakes responsibility to construct a memorial under this section, it shall not begin construction of the memorial until the master plan of the State Capitol Park is approved and adopted by the Joint Committee on Rules and the Joint Committee on Rules and the Department of Finance have determined that sufficient private funding is available to construct and maintain the memorial.

(h) The planning, construction, and maintenance of the memorial shall be funded exclusively through private donations to a nonprofit foundation, the Purple Heart Memorial Foundation, to be established for that purpose.

(i) If the Military Order of the Purple Heart, Capitol Chapter 385 undertakes responsibility to construct a memorial under this section, it shall sign a maintenance agreement with the state, as created under paragraph (6) of subdivision (d), to maintain the memorial with private contributions.

(j) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any new veterans memorial approved pursuant to the master plan of the State Capitol Park, as adopted by the Joint Committee on Rules, shall be constructed within the existing boundary of the Capitol Veterans Memorial.

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2008, Ch. 585, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2009.)


text:
(a) Upon its establishment, the California Crime Victims’ Memorial Foundation, or any successor entity, may plan and construct a memorial in the Capitol Historic Region, in consultation with the department, to honor California residents who are victims of crime.

(b) The California Crime Victims’ Memorial Review Committee is hereby established and shall include as members all of the following:

(1) The Director of General Services, or his or her designee.

(2) The State Historic Preservation Officer, or his or her designee.

(3) A Member of the Assembly appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly.

(4) A Member of the Senate appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules.

(c) The committee shall consult with the California Crime Victims’ Memorial Foundation to identify an appropriate location for the memorial in the Capitol Historic Region and review a memorial design.

(d) The department, in consultation with the California Crime Victims’ Memorial Foundation, shall accomplish the following goals:

(1) Review of the preliminary design plans to identify potential maintenance concerns.

(2) Ensure Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.) compliance, and other safety concerns.

(3) Review and approval of proper California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code) documents prepared for work at the designated historic property.

(4) Review of final construction documents to ensure that all requirements are met.

(5) Prepare the right-of-entry permit outlining the final area of work, final construction documents, construction plans, the contractor hired to perform the work, insurance, bonding, provisions for damage to state property, and inspection requirements.

(6) Prepare a maintenance agreement outlining the California Crime Victims’ Memorial Foundation’s responsibility for the long-term maintenance of the memorial due to aging, vandalism, or relocation.

(7) Inspect the construction performed by the contractor selected by the California Crime Victims’ Memorial Foundation.

(e) If the California Crime Victims’ Memorial Foundation undertakes responsibility to construct a memorial under this section, it shall, in consultation with the department, establish a schedule for the design, construction, and dedication of the memorial, implement procedures to solicit designs for the memorial and devise a selection process for the choice of the design, and establish a program for the dedication of the memorial.

(f) The department and the California Crime Victims’ Memorial Review Committee shall approve the design of the memorial.

(g) If the California Crime Victims’ Memorial Foundation undertakes responsibility to construct a memorial under this section, it shall not begin construction of the memorial until (1) the master plan of the State Capitol Park is approved and adopted by the Joint Committee on Rules and (2) the Department of Finance and the Joint Committee on Rules have determined that sufficient private funding is available to construct and maintain the memorial.

(h) The planning, construction, and maintenance of the memorial shall be funded exclusively through private donations to a nonprofit foundation, the California Crime Victims’ Memorial Foundation, to be established for that purpose.

(i) If the California Crime Victims’ Memorial Foundation undertakes responsibility to construct a memorial under this section, it shall sign a maintenance agreement with the state, as created under paragraph (6) of subdivision (d), to maintain the memorial with private contributions.

history: (History: Added by Stats. 2008, Ch. 584, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2009.)